His chapter on prejudice was very stimulating, including the insight that when it comes to race we overestimate our differences and underestimate what we have in common.3. Wilson's clear-eyed examination of the problems with policy makers, self-help authors andnon-psychologists who rely on common sense to solve problems and fall into the trap ofequaling correlation with causation.2. However, his other chapters provide interesting ideas on how storyediting can be used to counter what would seem to be intractable personal and social problems.My three main take-aways were:1. His chapter on raising kids seemed the weakest, especially the minimal sufficiencyprincipal, which I took as too fine a line when trying to be neither too harsh or too lenient when disciplining children. initiatives don't work,have never been scientifically tested and why efforts such as these deserve what he calls,"Bloodletting" awards - solutions that seem to make sense, much like bloodletting once did to physicians, but do more harm than good.Wilson discusses shaping our personal narratives and expands from there to the topics of raising kids, preventing teen pregnancy, teenage violence, alcohol and drug abuse, prejudice and the achievement gap. Wilson is built around the concept of Story Editing, which he describes asusing changes, or edits, in the stories we use to understand ourselves and the social world aroundus, to make lasting changes in our lives and the lives of others.He shows why Self-Help authors, Scared Straight programs and D.A.R.E.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |